Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

All Data

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

County: Sacramento

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento Adults who Binge Drink: Last 30 Days

Current Value:
14.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 14.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 14.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Sacramento has a value of 14.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Sacramento Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate

Current Value:
382.8
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 382.8 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 371.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 437.5.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (291.0), Sacramento has a value of 382.8 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(291.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (382.8) is less and better than the previously measured value (411.4).
Prior Value
(411.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate

Current Value:
30.0
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (19.8), Sacramento has a value of 30.0.
CA Value
(19.8)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (30.0) is greater  than the previously measured value (26.7).
Prior Value
(26.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to All Opioid Overdose

Current Value:
14.9
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 14.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.4.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (18.7), Sacramento has a value of 14.9 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(18.7)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (14.9) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (14.3).
Prior Value
(14.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Drug Use

Current Value:
22.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 22.9 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 31.0.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (21.4), Sacramento has a value of 22.9 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(21.4)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (22.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (20.8).
Prior Value
(20.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Fentanyl Overdose

Current Value:
12.3
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 12.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.3.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (16.6), Sacramento has a value of 12.3 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(16.6)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (12.3) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (10.3).
Prior Value
(10.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heroin Overdose

Current Value:
1.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 1.4 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.6.
CA Counties
(2018)
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (1.2), Sacramento has a value of 1.4 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(1.2)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (1.4) is less and better than the previously measured value (2.2).
Prior Value
(2.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (4.2), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(4.2)

County: Sacramento Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Prescription Opioid Overdose

14.5
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 14.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.9.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (18.1), Sacramento has a value of 14.5 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(18.1)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (14.5) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (13.1).
Prior Value
(13.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Synthetic Opioid Overdose (excluding Methadone)

12.5
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 12.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.3.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (16.7), Sacramento has a value of 12.5 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(16.7)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (12.5) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (10.5).
Prior Value
(10.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.9), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.9)
<div>IVP-22: Reduce overdose deaths involving synthetic opioids other than methadone</div>

County: Sacramento Age-Adjusted Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Death Rate

17.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 17.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.0.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 48 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 17.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,303 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (16.5), Sacramento has a value of 17.6 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(16.5)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (23.5), Sacramento has a value of 17.6 which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (17.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.9).
Prior Value
(16.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Sacramento Age-Adjusted ED Visit Rate due to All Drug Overdose

Current Value:
137.3
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 137.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 141.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 183.3.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (143.7), Sacramento has a value of 137.3 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(143.7)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (137.3) is less and better than the previously measured value (157.0).
Prior Value
(157.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Age-Adjusted ED Visit Rate due to Heroin Overdose

Current Value:
2.9
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 2.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 5.9.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (3.6), Sacramento has a value of 2.9 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(3.6)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (2.9) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (1.1).
Prior Value
(1.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Age-Adjusted ED Visit Rate due to Opioid Overdose (excluding Heroin)

47.3
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 47.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 70.0.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (54.9), Sacramento has a value of 47.3 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(54.9)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (47.3) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (9.7).
Prior Value
(9.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to All Drug Overdose

44.7
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 44.7 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 45.9.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (48.3), Sacramento has a value of 44.7 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(48.3)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (44.7) is less and better than the previously measured value (45.3).
Prior Value
(45.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Heroin Overdose

0.8
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 0.8 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 0.8.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (0.7), Sacramento has a value of 0.8 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(0.7)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (0.8) is less and better than the previously measured value (1.1).
Prior Value
(1.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Opioid Overdose (excluding Heroin)

10.9
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 10.9 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.8.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (12.1), Sacramento has a value of 10.9 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(12.1)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (10.9) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (9.7).
Prior Value
(9.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Age-Adjusted Long Acting or Extended Release Opioid Prescription Rate to Opioid Naive Residents

1.8
Per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 1.8 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (1.2), Sacramento has a value of 1.8 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(1.2)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (1.8) is less and better than the previously measured value (2.0).
Prior Value
(2.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning

Current Value:
18.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 18.5 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.6.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 52 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 18.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,797 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (17.3), Sacramento has a value of 18.5 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(17.3)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (23.0), Sacramento has a value of 18.5 which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (18.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.9).
Prior Value
(16.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (20.7), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(20.7)
<div>SU-03: Reduce drug overdose deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Sacramento Opioid Prescription Patients

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Opioid Prescription Patients

2.9%
(Q3 2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 2.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.6%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (2.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.9%).
Prior Value
(2.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Quarterly Opioid Prescription Rate

Current Value:
365.2
Prescriptions per 10,000 population
(Q3 2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 365.2 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 333.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 444.0.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (365.2) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (362.9).
Prior Value
(362.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Residents on More than 90 Morphine Milligram Equivalents (MME) of Opioids Daily

8.8
Residents on >90 MMEs of Opioids per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 8.8 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (6.3), Sacramento has a value of 8.8 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(6.3)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (8.8) is less and better than the previously measured value (9.8).
Prior Value
(9.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento

Health / Cancer

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento

Health / Cancer

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento Adults with Cancer

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Adults with Cancer

6.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Sacramento has a value of 6.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Sacramento Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Breast Cancer

Current Value:
20.0
Deaths per 100,000 females
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 20.0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.9.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 56 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (17.8), Sacramento has a value of 20.0 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(17.8)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (20.0), Sacramento has a value of 20.0.
US Value
(20.0 in 2016)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Cancer Institute
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (20.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (20.1).
Prior Value
(20.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (15.3), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(15.3)

County: Sacramento Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cancer

Current Value:
147.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 147.1 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 131.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 143.2.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (124.9), Sacramento has a value of 147.1 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(124.9)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (155.9), Sacramento has a value of 147.1 which is lower and better.
US Value
(155.9 in 2016)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Cancer Institute
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (147.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (149.8).
Prior Value
(149.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (122.7), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(122.7)

County: Sacramento Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Colorectal Cancer

Current Value:
14.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 14.6 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (11.7), Sacramento has a value of 14.6 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(11.7)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (13.7), Sacramento has a value of 14.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.7 in 2016)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Cancer Institute
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (14.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.9).
Prior Value
(13.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.9), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.9)

County: Sacramento Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Lung Cancer

Current Value:
27.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 27.1 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.7.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (21.6), Sacramento has a value of 27.1 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(21.6)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (38.5), Sacramento has a value of 27.1 which is lower and better.
US Value
(38.5 in 2016)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Cancer Institute
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (27.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (28.1).
Prior Value
(28.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.1), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.1)

County: Sacramento Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Prostate Cancer

Current Value:
23.2
Deaths per 100,000 males
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 23.2 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.4.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (18.4), Sacramento has a value of 23.2 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(18.4)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (19.4), Sacramento has a value of 23.2 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(19.4 in 2016)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Cancer Institute
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (23.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (24.0).
Prior Value
(24.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (16.9), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(16.9)

County: Sacramento Breast Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Breast Cancer Incidence Rate

123.4
Cases per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 123.4 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 121.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 129.6.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 56 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 123.4 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 122.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 133.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,478 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (121.0), Sacramento has a value of 123.4 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(121.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (127.0), Sacramento has a value of 123.4 which is lower and better.
US Value
(127.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (123.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (128.1).
Prior Value
(128.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Cancer: Medicare Population

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Cancer: Medicare Population

12.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 12.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 12.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Sacramento has a value of 12.0% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Sacramento has a value of 12.0%.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (12.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (11.0%).
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Cervical Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Cervical Cancer Incidence Rate

7.2
Cases per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 7.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.1.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 40 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 7.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 696 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (7.3), Sacramento has a value of 7.2 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(7.3)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (7.5), Sacramento has a value of 7.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (7.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.4).
Prior Value
(7.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65

Current Value:
81.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 81.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 81.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 81.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 81.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), Sacramento has a value of 81.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Sacramento Colon Cancer Screening: Sigmoidoscopy Past 5 Years and FOBT Past 3 Years, Colonoscopy Past 10 Years, or FOBT Past Year

69.8%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 69.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 67.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 69.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), Sacramento has a value of 69.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Sacramento Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation

Current Value:
62.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 62.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 62.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.1%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 62.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 70.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 67.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), Sacramento has a value of 62.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Sacramento Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
35.7
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 35.7 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 33.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.2.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 56 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 35.7 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 46.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,401 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (33.5), Sacramento has a value of 35.7 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(33.5)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (36.5), Sacramento has a value of 35.7 which is lower and better.
US Value
(36.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (35.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (36.9).
Prior Value
(36.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
46.0
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 46.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 39.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 47.4.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 55 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 46.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 74.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,471 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (37.6), Sacramento has a value of 46.0 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(37.6)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (54.0), Sacramento has a value of 46.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(54.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (46.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (49.3).
Prior Value
(49.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74

Current Value:
68.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 68.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 67.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 66.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 68.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 70.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 67.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Sacramento has a value of 68.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

County: Sacramento Mammography Screening: Medicare Population

Current Value:
45.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 45.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 41.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 38.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 45.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 45.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 40.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,123 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (41.0%), Sacramento has a value of 45.0% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(41.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (47.0%), Sacramento has a value of 45.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (45.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (44.0%).
Prior Value
(44.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Oral Cavity and Pharynx Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
11.9
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 11.9 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 54 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 11.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,706 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (10.1), Sacramento has a value of 11.9 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(10.1)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (11.9), Sacramento has a value of 11.9.
US Value
(11.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (11.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.8).
Prior Value
(11.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate

84.7
Cases per 100,000 males
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 84.7 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 93.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 102.0.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 84.7 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 107.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 125.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,500 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (95.4), Sacramento has a value of 84.7 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(95.4)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (110.5), Sacramento has a value of 84.7 which is lower and better.
US Value
(110.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (84.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (82.4).
Prior Value
(82.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento

Health / Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento

Health / Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento Adults with Diabetes

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Adults with Diabetes

12.7%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 12.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.9%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (10.7%), Sacramento has a value of 12.7% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(10.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (11.5%), Sacramento has a value of 12.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.5% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (12.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.0%).
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes

Current Value:
28.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 28.5 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.8.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (23.1), Sacramento has a value of 28.5 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(23.1)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.8), Sacramento has a value of 28.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (28.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (29.2).
Prior Value
(29.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Diabetes: Medicare Population

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Diabetes: Medicare Population

23.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 23.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.3%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 23.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (21.0%), Sacramento has a value of 23.0% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.0%), Sacramento has a value of 23.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (23.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (23.0%).
Prior Value
(23.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento

Health / Disabilities

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento

Health / Disabilities

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento Adults with Disability

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Adults with Disability

31.9%
(2016)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (29.7%), Sacramento has a value of 31.9%.
CA Value
(29.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (20.6%), Sacramento has a value of 31.9%.
US Value
(20.6% in 2015)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (31.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (32.5%).
Prior Value
(32.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Adults with Disability Living in Poverty

Current Value:
24.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 24.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.1%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 24.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (22.7%), Sacramento has a value of 24.5% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Sacramento has a value of 24.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Children with a Disability

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Children with a Disability

3.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (3.7%), Sacramento has a value of 3.8%.
CA Value
(3.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (4.5%), Sacramento has a value of 3.8%.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty

Current Value:
5.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (4.6%), Sacramento has a value of 5.5%.
CA Value
(4.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (5.3%), Sacramento has a value of 5.5%.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Persons with a Disability

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Persons with a Disability

12.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Sacramento has a value of 12.3%.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Sacramento has a value of 12.3%.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Persons with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:
3.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (2.9%), Sacramento has a value of 3.1%.
CA Value
(2.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.6%), Sacramento has a value of 3.1%.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:
3.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (2.7%), Sacramento has a value of 3.1%.
CA Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (2.6%), Sacramento has a value of 3.1%.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Persons with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:
2.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (2.1%), Sacramento has a value of 2.2%.
CA Value
(2.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Sacramento has a value of 2.2%.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty

Current Value:
6.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (5.8%), Sacramento has a value of 6.5%.
CA Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (6.7%), Sacramento has a value of 6.5%.
US Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento

Health / Family Planning

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento

Health / Family Planning

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento Teen Birth Rate: 15-19

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Teen Birth Rate: 15-19

9.7
Live births per 1,000 females aged 15-19
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 9.7 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.6.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 55 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (10.3), Sacramento has a value of 9.7 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(10.3)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (15.2), Sacramento has a value of 9.7 which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (9.7) is less and better than the previously measured value (10.9).
Prior Value
(10.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento

Health / Food Safety

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento

Health / Food Safety

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento Salmonella Infection Incidence Rate

Current Value:
9.5
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 9.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.1.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 55 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (14.4), Sacramento has a value of 9.5 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(14.4)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (9.5) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (9.2).
Prior Value
(9.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (11.5), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(11.5)

County: Sacramento

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento Adults Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care

Current Value:
19.4%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (22.0%), Sacramento has a value of 19.4% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(22.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (19.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (19.8%).
Prior Value
(19.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Adults who have had a Routine Checkup

Current Value:
63.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 63.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 63.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 63.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (73.6%), Sacramento has a value of 63.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(73.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Sacramento Adults with Health Insurance: 18-64

Current Value:
93.9%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 93.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 92.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 89.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (91.2%), Sacramento has a value of 93.9% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(91.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (93.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (95.4%).
Prior Value
(95.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Adults without Health Insurance

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Adults without Health Insurance

8.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 8.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 8.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), Sacramento has a value of 8.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Sacramento Children and Teens Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care

7.3%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (8.7%), Sacramento has a value of 7.3% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(8.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (7.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.5%).
Prior Value
(6.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Sacramento Children with Health Insurance

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Children with Health Insurance

97.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 97.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 97.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 96.2%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 42 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 97.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 96.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 93.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (96.8%), Sacramento has a value of 97.1% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(96.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (94.9%), Sacramento has a value of 97.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(94.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (97.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (97.6%).
Prior Value
(97.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Community Spending on Health Care

Current Value:
6.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (6.4%), Sacramento has a value of 6.9%.
CA Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (8.0%), Sacramento has a value of 6.9%.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (6.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.9%).
Prior Value
(6.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Sacramento Health Insurance Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:
5.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 5.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.9%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 5.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (5.0%), Sacramento has a value of 5.5% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (5.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.5%).
Prior Value
(5.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Sacramento Medicare Healthcare Costs

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Medicare Healthcare Costs

$8,073
Dollars per enrollee
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value ($9,100), Sacramento has a value of $8,073.
CA Value
($9,100)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value ($9,729), Sacramento has a value of $8,073.
US Value
($9,729)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento ($8,073) is greater  than the previously measured value ($7,828).
Prior Value
($7,828)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Non-Physician Primary Care Provider Rate

Current Value:
81
Providers per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 81 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 80 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 66.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 81 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (80), Sacramento has a value of 81 which is higher and better.
CA Value
(80)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (81) is greater and better than the previously measured value (75).
Prior Value
(75)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento People Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care

Current Value:
16.1%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 16.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.2%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (16.5%), Sacramento has a value of 16.1% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(16.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (16.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (18.6%).
Prior Value
(18.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.9%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.9%)

County: Sacramento People with a Usual Source of Health Care

Current Value:
87.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 87.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 84.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 81.3%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (82.5%), Sacramento has a value of 87.2% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(82.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (87.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (86.9%).
Prior Value
(86.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Persons with Health Insurance

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Persons with Health Insurance

94.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 94.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 92.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 91.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 94.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (91.9%), Sacramento has a value of 94.0% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(91.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (94.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (93.6%).
Prior Value
(93.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (92.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Sacramento Persons with Private Health Insurance Only

Current Value:
52.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (53.5%), Sacramento has a value of 52.8%.
CA Value
(53.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (54.8%), Sacramento has a value of 52.8%.
US Value
(54.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (52.8%) is less  than the previously measured value (55.1%).
Prior Value
(55.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Persons with Public Health Insurance Only

Current Value:
30.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (29.8%), Sacramento has a value of 30.0%.
CA Value
(29.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.8%), Sacramento has a value of 30.0%.
US Value
(24.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (30.0%) is greater  than the previously measured value (27.6%).
Prior Value
(27.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population

Current Value:
2,732.0
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 2,732.0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,111.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2,576.5.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 2,732.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,729.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,374.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (2,275.0), Sacramento has a value of 2,732.0 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(2,275.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (2,677.0), Sacramento has a value of 2,732.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(2,677.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (2,732.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (2,532.0).
Prior Value
(2,532.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Primary Care Provider Rate

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Primary Care Provider Rate

91
Providers per 100,000 population
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 91 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 67 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 44.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 91 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 47 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 30.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,995 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (81), Sacramento has a value of 91 which is higher and better.
CA Value
(81)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (91) is greater and better than the previously measured value (90).
Prior Value
(90)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento

Health / Health Information Technology

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento

Health / Health Information Technology

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento Households with an Internet Subscription

Current Value:
92.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 92.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 92.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 83.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (91.6%), Sacramento has a value of 92.8% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(91.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (88.5%), Sacramento has a value of 92.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices

Current Value:
96.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 96.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 94.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 93.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 96.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 88.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (95.9%), Sacramento has a value of 96.4% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(95.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (94.0%), Sacramento has a value of 96.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(94.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Persons with an Internet Subscription

Current Value:
94.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 94.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 92.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 88.9%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 94.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 87.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (93.4%), Sacramento has a value of 94.4% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(93.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (91.0%), Sacramento has a value of 94.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento Adults who Experienced a Stroke

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Adults who Experienced a Stroke

3.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 3.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.7%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 3.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (3.3%), Sacramento has a value of 3.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Sacramento Adults who Experienced Coronary Heart Disease

Current Value:
5.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 5.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.3%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 5.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (6.1%), Sacramento has a value of 5.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Sacramento Adults who Have Taken Medications for High Blood Pressure

72.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 72.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.2%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 72.9% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 80.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Sacramento has a value of 72.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Sacramento Adults with Heart Disease

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Adults with Heart Disease

7.6%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (6.9%), Sacramento has a value of 7.6% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(6.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (7.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (6.5%).
Prior Value
(6.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke)

48.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 48.4 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 42.5.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (37.2), Sacramento has a value of 48.4 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(37.2)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (38.8), Sacramento has a value of 48.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(38.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (48.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (46.6).
Prior Value
(46.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (33.4), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(33.4)

County: Sacramento Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease

Current Value:
81.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 81.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 80.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 98.6.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (79.0), Sacramento has a value of 81.0 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(79.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (91.8), Sacramento has a value of 81.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(91.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (81.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (87.4).
Prior Value
(87.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (71.1), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(71.1)

County: Sacramento Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Attack

Current Value:
42.1
Deaths per 100,000 population 35+ years
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 42.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 51.5.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 49 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (44.4), Sacramento has a value of 42.1 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(44.4)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (42.1) is less and better than the previously measured value (42.7).
Prior Value
(42.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Heart Attack

Current Value:
27.8
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 35+ years
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 27.8 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.8.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 56 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (25.5), Sacramento has a value of 27.8 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(25.5)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (27.8) is less and better than the previously measured value (28.4).
Prior Value
(28.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population

Current Value:
13.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 13.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 13.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (13.0%), Sacramento has a value of 13.0%.
CA Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (14.0%), Sacramento has a value of 13.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (13.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.0%).
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Cholesterol Test History

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Cholesterol Test History

85.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 85.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 85.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 82.9%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 85.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 84.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 82.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (86.4%), Sacramento has a value of 85.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(86.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Sacramento Heart Failure: Medicare Population

Current Value:
10.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 10.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 10.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (10.0%), Sacramento has a value of 10.0%.
CA Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Sacramento has a value of 10.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (10.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.0%).
Prior Value
(10.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento High Blood Pressure Prevalence

Current Value:

County: Sacramento High Blood Pressure Prevalence

34.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 34.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 42.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (34.8%), Sacramento has a value of 34.2% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(34.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (32.4%), Sacramento has a value of 34.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(32.4% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (34.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (26.1%).
Prior Value
(26.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (41.9%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(41.9%)

County: Sacramento High Cholesterol Prevalence: Past 5 Years

Current Value:
32.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 32.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 32.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 38.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (36.4%), Sacramento has a value of 32.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(36.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Sacramento Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population

Current Value:
58.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 58.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 61.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 58.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 67.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (61.0%), Sacramento has a value of 58.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Sacramento has a value of 58.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (58.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (57.0%).
Prior Value
(57.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Hypertension: Medicare Population

Current Value:
59.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 59.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 59.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 62.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 59.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 67.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (58.0%), Sacramento has a value of 59.0% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(58.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Sacramento has a value of 59.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (59.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (59.0%).
Prior Value
(59.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population

Current Value:
16.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 16.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 16.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (18.0%), Sacramento has a value of 16.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (21.0%), Sacramento has a value of 16.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (16.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (15.0%).
Prior Value
(15.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Stroke: Medicare Population

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Stroke: Medicare Population

5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 5.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (5.0%), Sacramento has a value of 5.0%.
CA Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Sacramento has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (5.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.0%).
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Influenza and Pneumonia

Current Value:
11.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 11.9 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.3.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (11.5), Sacramento has a value of 11.9 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(11.5)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (13.0), Sacramento has a value of 11.9 which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.0 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (11.9) is less and better than the previously measured value (14.8).
Prior Value
(14.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Coccidioidomycosis (Valley Fever) Rate

Current Value:
3.2
Per 100,000 population
(2012)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (10.82), Sacramento has a value of 3.2 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(10.82)
The regional value is compared to the CA State Value.

County: Sacramento COVID-19 Daily Average Case-Fatality Rate

Current Value:
1.6
Deaths per 100 cases
(Mar 3, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 1.6 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.3.
CA Counties
(Feb 3, 2023)
The distribution is based on data from 56 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 1.6 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.3.
U.S. Counties
(Mar 25, 2022)
The distribution is based on data from 2,811 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (1.0), Sacramento has a value of 1.6 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(1.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.7), Sacramento has a value of 1.6 which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (1.6) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (0.5).
Prior Value
(0.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento COVID-19 Daily Average Incidence Rate

Current Value:
7.89
Cases per 100,000 population
(Mar 3, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 7.89 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.99 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.75.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 7.89 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.84 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.01.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (6.23), Sacramento has a value of 7.89 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(6.23)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.97), Sacramento has a value of 7.89 which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.97)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (7.89) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (6.70).
Prior Value
(6.70)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population

Current Value:
46.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 46.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 44.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 36.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 46.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 43.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 36.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (48.0%), Sacramento has a value of 46.0% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(48.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (50.0%), Sacramento has a value of 46.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (46.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (45.0%).
Prior Value
(45.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Kindergartners with Required Immunizations

Current Value:
92.7%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 92.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 94.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 90.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 56 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (92.8%), Sacramento has a value of 92.7% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(92.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (92.7%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (91.5%).
Prior Value
(91.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Persons Fully Vaccinated Against COVID-19

Current Value:
70.3%
(May 10, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 70.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 63.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 55.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 50 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 70.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 52.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 44.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,125 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (70.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (70.3%).
Prior Value
(70.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population

Current Value:
7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 7.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 7.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 6.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 7.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 5.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (8.0%), Sacramento has a value of 7.0% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (8.0%), Sacramento has a value of 7.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (7.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (6.0%).
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Tuberculosis Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Tuberculosis Incidence Rate

4.9
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 4.9 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.95 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.30.
CA Counties
(2019)
The distribution is based on data from 31 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (4.7), Sacramento has a value of 4.9 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(4.7)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (2.4), Sacramento has a value of 4.9 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(2.4 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (4.9) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (4.8).
Prior Value
(4.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (1.4), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(1.4)

County: Sacramento

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento Babies with Low Birthweight

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Babies with Low Birthweight

7.2%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 7.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.2%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 56 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (7.1%), Sacramento has a value of 7.2% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(7.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (8.5%), Sacramento has a value of 7.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.5% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (7.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.1%).
Prior Value
(7.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Babies with Very Low Birthweight

Current Value:
1.2%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 1.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.1%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (1.1%), Sacramento has a value of 1.2% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.4%), Sacramento has a value of 1.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (1.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1.2%).
Prior Value
(1.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Infant Mortality Rate

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Infant Mortality Rate

4.6
Deaths per 1,000 live births
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (3.9), Sacramento has a value of 4.6 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(3.9)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (5.7), Sacramento has a value of 4.6 which is lower and better.
US Value
(5.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (4.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.5).
Prior Value
(4.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.0), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.0)
<div>MICH-02: Reduce the rate of infant deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Sacramento Mothers who Breastfeed

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Mothers who Breastfeed

92.8%
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 92.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 95.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 92.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (93.8%), Sacramento has a value of 92.8% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(93.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (92.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (92.7%).
Prior Value
(92.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Mothers who Received Early Prenatal Care

Current Value:
87.6%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 87.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 84.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.3%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (87.9%), Sacramento has a value of 87.6% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(87.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (78.3%), Sacramento has a value of 87.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(78.3% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (87.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (86.4%).
Prior Value
(86.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Preterm Births

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Preterm Births

9.0%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 9.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (9.0%), Sacramento has a value of 9.0%.
CA Value
(9.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (9.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.1%).
Prior Value
(9.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (9.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(9.4%)

County: Sacramento

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression

Current Value:
18.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 18.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.6%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 18.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (19.5%), Sacramento has a value of 18.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(19.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Sacramento Adults Needing and Receiving Behavioral Health Care Services

59.8%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 59.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 55.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (55.9%), Sacramento has a value of 59.8% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(55.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (59.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (56.1%).
Prior Value
(56.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Adults with Likely Serious Psychological Distress

Current Value:
16.8%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 16.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.7%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (16.7%), Sacramento has a value of 16.8% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (16.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.5%).
Prior Value
(15.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide

Current Value:
12.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 12.1 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.6.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (10.3), Sacramento has a value of 12.1 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(10.3)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (13.5), Sacramento has a value of 12.1 which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.5 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (12.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.6).
Prior Value
(12.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (12.8), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(12.8)
<div>MHMD-01: Reduce the suicide rate <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Sacramento Depression: Medicare Population

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Depression: Medicare Population

16.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 16.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 16.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (14.0%), Sacramento has a value of 16.0% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (16.0%), Sacramento has a value of 16.0%.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (16.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.0%).
Prior Value
(16.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Mental Health Provider Rate

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Mental Health Provider Rate

418
Providers per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 418 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 376 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 244.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 418 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 131 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,941 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (424), Sacramento has a value of 418 which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(424)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (418) is less and worse than the previously measured value (419).
Prior Value
(419)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days

15.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 15.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.6%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 15.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (14.7%), Sacramento has a value of 15.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(14.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Sacramento

Health / Mortality Data

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento

Health / Mortality Data

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento Life Expectancy

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Life Expectancy

79.2
Years
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 79.2 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 79.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 77.6.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 79.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 76.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,072 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (81.0), Sacramento has a value of 79.2 which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(81.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (78.5), Sacramento has a value of 79.2 which is higher and better.
US Value
(78.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (79.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (79.6).
Prior Value
(79.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento Adult Fast Food Consumption

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Adult Fast Food Consumption

63.7%
(2016)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 63.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 59.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 69.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (65.6%), Sacramento has a value of 63.7% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(65.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (63.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (60.5%).
Prior Value
(60.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Adults who Drink Sugar-Sweetened Beverages

Current Value:
15.9%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (13.7%), Sacramento has a value of 15.9% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (15.9%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (10.2%).
Prior Value
(10.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Sacramento Child and Teen Fruit Consumption

Current Value:
76.7%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 76.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 63.7%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (69.8%), Sacramento has a value of 76.7% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(69.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (76.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (72.7%).
Prior Value
(72.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento

Health / Older Adults

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento

Health / Older Adults

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento Adult Day Care Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:
13.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 13.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 13.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (13.4%), Sacramento has a value of 13.4%.
CA Value
(13.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (13.4%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (13.3%).
Prior Value
(13.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Sacramento Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Females

34.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 34.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 31.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 28.6%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 34.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 36.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 33.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (37.9%), Sacramento has a value of 34.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(37.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Sacramento Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Males

37.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 37.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 38.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 35.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 37.6% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 42.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 39.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (43.7%), Sacramento has a value of 37.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(43.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Sacramento Adults 65+ with a Disability

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Adults 65+ with a Disability

36.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (33.5%), Sacramento has a value of 36.1%.
CA Value
(33.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), Sacramento has a value of 36.1%.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:
13.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (12.9%), Sacramento has a value of 13.8%.
CA Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Sacramento has a value of 13.8%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:
10.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (9.5%), Sacramento has a value of 10.1%.
CA Value
(9.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (7.4%), Sacramento has a value of 10.1%.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:
6.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (6.1%), Sacramento has a value of 6.3%.
CA Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Sacramento has a value of 6.3%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty

Current Value:
17.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (16.4%), Sacramento has a value of 17.7%.
CA Value
(16.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (13.6%), Sacramento has a value of 17.7%.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population

Current Value:
6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 6.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 5.3%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (5.0%), Sacramento has a value of 6.0% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Sacramento has a value of 6.0%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (6.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.0%).
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Elder Index (Elderly Household Below Income Threshold)

Current Value:
24.5%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 24.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (27.7%), Sacramento has a value of 24.5% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(27.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (24.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (24.7%).
Prior Value
(24.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento

Health / Oral Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento

Health / Oral Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss

Current Value:
8.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 8.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.1%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 8.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (13.4%), Sacramento has a value of 8.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Sacramento Adults who Visited a Dentist

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Adults who Visited a Dentist

63.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 63.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 62.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 63.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (64.8%), Sacramento has a value of 63.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Sacramento Children who Visited a Dentist

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Children who Visited a Dentist

86.6%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (89.5%), Sacramento has a value of 86.6% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(89.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.

County: Sacramento Dentist Rate

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Dentist Rate

81
Dentists per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 81 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 78 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 81 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 43 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 27.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,056 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (91), Sacramento has a value of 81 which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(91)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (81) is greater and better than the previously measured value (80).
Prior Value
(80)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento

Health / Other Conditions

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento

Health / Other Conditions

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento Adults with Arthritis

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Adults with Arthritis

21.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 21.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 23.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.7%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 21.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 30.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (25.2%), Sacramento has a value of 21.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(25.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Sacramento Adults with Kidney Disease

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Adults with Kidney Disease

3.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 3.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.7%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 3.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (3.1%), Sacramento has a value of 3.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Sacramento Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population

Current Value:
18.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 18.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 18.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (16.0%), Sacramento has a value of 18.0% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (18.0%), Sacramento has a value of 18.0%.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (18.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (17.0%).
Prior Value
(17.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Osteoporosis: Medicare Population

Current Value:
11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 11.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (13.0%), Sacramento has a value of 11.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Sacramento has a value of 11.0%.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (11.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.0%).
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population

33.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 33.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 31.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 33.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (32.0%), Sacramento has a value of 33.0% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(32.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (35.0%), Sacramento has a value of 33.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (33.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (31.0%).
Prior Value
(31.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento

Health / Physical Activity

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento

Health / Physical Activity

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento 7th Grade Students who are Physically Fit

Current Value:
65.4%
(2018-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 65.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 56.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (61.0%), Sacramento has a value of 65.4% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (65.4%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (64.4%).
Prior Value
(64.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Adults 20+ who are Sedentary

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Adults 20+ who are Sedentary

17.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 17.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.9%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 17.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (17.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (19.1%).
Prior Value
(19.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Teens who Engage in Regular Physical Activity

Current Value:
65.5%
(2011-2012)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 65.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 70.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 44 California counties and county groups.
Compared to the CA Value (68.5%), Sacramento has a value of 65.5% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(68.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (65.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (71.7%).
Prior Value
(71.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Sacramento

Health / Prevention & Safety

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento

Health / Prevention & Safety

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Firearms

Current Value:
9.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 9.2 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.8.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 45 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 9.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,083 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (7.4), Sacramento has a value of 9.2 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(7.4)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (12.0), Sacramento has a value of 9.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (9.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.9).
Prior Value
(8.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.7), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.7)

County: Sacramento Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries

Current Value:
50.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 50.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 70.9.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (43.4), Sacramento has a value of 50.2 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(43.4)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (57.6), Sacramento has a value of 50.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(57.6 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (50.2) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (44.2).
Prior Value
(44.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (43.2), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(43.2)

County: Sacramento

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento Adults with Asthma

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Adults with Asthma

20.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 20.6% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (17.0%), Sacramento has a value of 20.6% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (15.7%), Sacramento has a value of 20.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (20.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (20.4%).
Prior Value
(20.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Adults with COPD

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Adults with COPD

5.7%
Percent of adults
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 5.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.7%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 5.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (6.4%), Sacramento has a value of 5.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Sacramento Adults with Current Asthma

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Adults with Current Asthma

9.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 9.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.2%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 9.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (9.7%), Sacramento has a value of 9.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Sacramento Asthma: Medicare Population

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Asthma: Medicare Population

7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 7.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 7.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (7.0%), Sacramento has a value of 7.0%.
CA Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Sacramento has a value of 7.0%.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (7.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.0%).
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Children and Teens with Asthma

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Children and Teens with Asthma

11.1%
(2015-2016)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 11.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 43 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (14.6%), Sacramento has a value of 11.1% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(14.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (11.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.7%).
Prior Value
(12.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Sacramento COPD: Medicare Population

Current Value:

County: Sacramento COPD: Medicare Population

10.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 10.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 10.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (8.0%), Sacramento has a value of 10.0% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Sacramento has a value of 10.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (10.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.0%).
Prior Value
(10.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento

Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento

Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento Chlamydia Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Chlamydia Incidence Rate

482.9
Cases per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 482.9 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 344.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 485.7.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (484.7), Sacramento has a value of 482.9 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(484.7)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (495.5), Sacramento has a value of 482.9 which is lower and better.
US Value
(495.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (482.9) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (462.7).
Prior Value
(462.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Congenital Syphilis Incidence Rate

Current Value:
100.0
Cases per 100,000 live births
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 100.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 46.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 151.4.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (114.9), Sacramento has a value of 100.0 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(114.9)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (100.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (105.3).
Prior Value
(105.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (33.9), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(33.9)

County: Sacramento Death Rate Among Persons with Diagnosed HIV Infection

Current Value:
5.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 5.3 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.8.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (5.4), Sacramento has a value of 5.3 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(5.4)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (5.3) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (4.6).
Prior Value
(4.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Gonorrhea Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Gonorrhea Incidence Rate

279.2
Cases per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 279.2 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 140.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 212.7.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (230.9), Sacramento has a value of 279.2 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(230.9)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (214.0), Sacramento has a value of 279.2 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(214.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (279.2) is less and better than the previously measured value (286.3).
Prior Value
(286.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.