Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

Community and Economy Topic Dashboard

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Disabilities

Health / Disabilities

Health / Disabilities

County: Sacramento

Value
Compared to:

Health / Disabilities

County: Sacramento

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento Persons with a Disability

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Persons with a Disability

12.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Sacramento has a value of 12.3%.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Sacramento has a value of 12.3%.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Adults with Disability Living in Poverty

Current Value:
24.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 24.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.1%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 24.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (22.7%), Sacramento has a value of 24.5% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Sacramento has a value of 24.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

County: Sacramento

Value
Compared to:

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

County: Sacramento

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento Persons with Health Insurance

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Persons with Health Insurance

94.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 94.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 92.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 91.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 94.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (91.9%), Sacramento has a value of 94.0% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(91.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (94.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (93.6%).
Prior Value
(93.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (92.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Health / Health Information Technology

Health / Health Information Technology

Health / Health Information Technology

County: Sacramento

Value
Compared to:

Health / Health Information Technology

County: Sacramento

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento Households with an Internet Subscription

Current Value:
92.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 92.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 92.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 83.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (91.6%), Sacramento has a value of 92.8% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(91.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (88.5%), Sacramento has a value of 92.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices

Current Value:
96.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 96.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 94.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 93.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 96.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 88.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (95.9%), Sacramento has a value of 96.4% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(95.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (94.0%), Sacramento has a value of 96.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(94.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Persons with an Internet Subscription

Current Value:
94.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 94.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 92.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 88.9%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 94.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 87.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (93.4%), Sacramento has a value of 94.4% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(93.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (91.0%), Sacramento has a value of 94.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Prevention & Safety

Health / Prevention & Safety

Health / Prevention & Safety

County: Sacramento

Value
Compared to:

Health / Prevention & Safety

County: Sacramento

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Firearms

Current Value:
9.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 9.2 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.8.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 45 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 9.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,083 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (7.4), Sacramento has a value of 9.2 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(7.4)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (12.0), Sacramento has a value of 9.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (9.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.9).
Prior Value
(8.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.7), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.7)

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

County: Sacramento

Value
Compared to:

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

County: Sacramento

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento Adult Arrest Rate

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Adult Arrest Rate

22.0
Arrests per 1,000 population 18+
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 22.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 37.4.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (25.1), Sacramento has a value of 22.0 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(25.1)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (22.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (20.6).
Prior Value
(20.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Homicide

Current Value:
6.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 6.2 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.6.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 32 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 6.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 495 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (5.1), Sacramento has a value of 6.2 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(5.1)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (6.6), Sacramento has a value of 6.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (6.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.6).
Prior Value
(5.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.5), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.5)
<div>IVP-09: Reduce homicides <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Sacramento Deaths in Custody

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Deaths in Custody

0.2
Per 10,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (0.3), Sacramento has a value of 0.2 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(0.3)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (0.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.2).
Prior Value
(0.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Hate Crime Offenses

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Hate Crime Offenses

116
Offenses
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (116) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (78).
Prior Value
(78)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Juvenile Arrest Rate

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Juvenile Arrest Rate

2.3
Arrests per 1,000 population aged 0-17
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 2.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.8.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (2.8), Sacramento has a value of 2.3 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(2.8)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (2.3) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (1.8).
Prior Value
(1.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Demographics

Community / Demographics

Community / Demographics

County: Sacramento

Value
Compared to:

Community / Demographics

County: Sacramento

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento Population Over Age 65 (Count)

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Population Over Age 65 (Count)

230,399
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Public Safety

Community / Public Safety

Community / Public Safety

County: Sacramento

Value
Compared to:

Community / Public Safety

County: Sacramento

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Motor Vehicle Traffic Collisions

13.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 13.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.1.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (10.7), Sacramento has a value of 13.0 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(10.7)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (12.0), Sacramento has a value of 13.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (13.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.4).
Prior Value
(11.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.1), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.1)

County: Sacramento Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths

25.1%
Percent of driving deaths with alcohol involvement
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 25.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 30.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.6%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 25.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,116 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (26.7%), Sacramento has a value of 25.1% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(26.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (26.3%), Sacramento has a value of 25.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (25.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (26.0%).
Prior Value
(26.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Bicycle-Involved Collision Rate

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Bicycle-Involved Collision Rate

0.6
Collisions per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 0.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.0.
CA Counties
(2022)
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (0.3), Sacramento has a value of 0.6 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(0.3)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (0.6) is less and better than the previously measured value (31.0).
Prior Value
(31.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Social Environment

Community / Social Environment

Community / Social Environment

County: Sacramento

Value
Compared to:

Community / Social Environment

County: Sacramento

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento People 65+ Living Alone

Current Value:

County: Sacramento People 65+ Living Alone

25.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 25.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 25.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 27.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (22.0%), Sacramento has a value of 25.2% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(22.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (26.4%), Sacramento has a value of 25.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento People 65+ Living Alone (Count)

Current Value:

County: Sacramento People 65+ Living Alone (Count)

57,963
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Children in Single-Parent Households

Current Value:
24.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 24.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.3%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 24.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (22.4%), Sacramento has a value of 24.9% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(22.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Sacramento has a value of 24.9%.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Social Associations

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Social Associations

7.0
Membership associations per 10,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 7.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 6.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 4.6.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 7.0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 10.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 7.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (6.0), Sacramento has a value of 7.0 which is higher and better.
CA Value
(6.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (9.1), Sacramento has a value of 7.0 which is lower and worse.
US Value
(9.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (7.0) is less and worse than the previously measured value (7.2).
Prior Value
(7.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Transportation

Community / Transportation

Community / Transportation

County: Sacramento

Value
Compared to:

Community / Transportation

County: Sacramento

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento Mean Travel Time to Work

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Mean Travel Time to Work

27.8
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 27.8 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 31.0.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 27.8 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (29.2), Sacramento has a value of 27.8 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(29.2)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Sacramento has a value of 27.8 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Solo Drivers with a Long Commute

Current Value:
39.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 39.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 42.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 39.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 32.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 41.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (41.6%), Sacramento has a value of 39.3% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(41.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (36.4%), Sacramento has a value of 39.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(36.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (39.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (39.9%).
Prior Value
(39.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Employment

Economy / Employment

Economy / Employment

County: Sacramento

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Employment

County: Sacramento

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento Size of Labor Force

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Size of Labor Force

739,055
Persons
(January 2024)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (739,055) is greater and better than the previously measured value (732,765).
Prior Value
(732,765)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Food Insecurity

Economy / Food Insecurity

Economy / Food Insecurity

County: Sacramento

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Food Insecurity

County: Sacramento

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento Child Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Child Food Insecurity Rate

14.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 14.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.6%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 14.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (13.5%), Sacramento has a value of 14.3% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (12.8%), Sacramento has a value of 14.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (14.3%) is less and better than the previously measured value (17.3%).
Prior Value
(17.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Food Insecure Children Likely Ineligible for Assistance

28%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 28% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 29% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 28% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,134 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (34%), Sacramento has a value of 28% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(34%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (25%), Sacramento has a value of 28% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(25%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (28%) is less and better than the previously measured value (30%).
Prior Value
(30%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Food Insecurity Rate

10.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 10.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 10.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (10.5%), Sacramento has a value of 10.1% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(10.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.4%), Sacramento has a value of 10.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (10.1%) is less and better than the previously measured value (11.7%).
Prior Value
(11.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Households Receiving SNAP with Children

Current Value:
56.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (53.1%), Sacramento has a value of 56.3%.
CA Value
(53.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (47.9%), Sacramento has a value of 56.3%.
US Value
(47.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count)

Current Value:
39,648
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Projected Child Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:
19.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 19.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.7%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 19.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (16.8%), Sacramento has a value of 19.6% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(16.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (19.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (26.7%).
Prior Value
(26.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Sacramento Projected Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Projected Food Insecurity Rate

13.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 13.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 13.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (12.1%), Sacramento has a value of 13.4% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(12.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (13.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (17.4%).
Prior Value
(17.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Economy / Housing & Homes

Economy / Housing & Homes

Economy / Housing & Homes

County: Sacramento

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Housing & Homes

County: Sacramento

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento Homeownership

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Homeownership

55.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 55.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 54.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 50.6%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 55.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (51.4%), Sacramento has a value of 55.8% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(51.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (57.8%), Sacramento has a value of 55.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(57.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Mortgaged Owners Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Housing

32.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 32.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.9%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 42 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 32.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (37.6%), Sacramento has a value of 32.5% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(37.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (27.8%), Sacramento has a value of 32.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(27.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (32.5%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (31.9%).
Prior Value
(31.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

County: Sacramento Overcrowded Households

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Overcrowded Households

5.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 5.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.7%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (8.2%), Sacramento has a value of 5.7% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Sacramento has a value of 5.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent

54.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 54.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 55.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 54.9% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 49.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (54.4%), Sacramento has a value of 54.9% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Sacramento has a value of 54.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

County: Sacramento Severe Housing Problems

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Severe Housing Problems

21.2%
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 21.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.1%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 21.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (25.7%), Sacramento has a value of 21.2% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(25.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Sacramento has a value of 21.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (21.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (21.4%).
Prior Value
(21.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Income

Economy / Income

Economy / Income

County: Sacramento

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Income

County: Sacramento

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento Households that are Above the Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) Threshold

55.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 55.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 54.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 50.9%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (57.0%), Sacramento has a value of 55.1% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(57.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (55.1%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (59.1%).
Prior Value
(59.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Sacramento Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE)

32.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 32.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 32.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (31.0%), Sacramento has a value of 32.1% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(31.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (32.1%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (28.2%).
Prior Value
(28.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Sacramento Income Inequality

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Income Inequality

0.444
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 0.444 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.461 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 0.481.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 0.444 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.445 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 0.470.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (0.490), Sacramento has a value of 0.444 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(0.490)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (0.483), Sacramento has a value of 0.444 which is lower and better.
US Value
(0.483)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Median Household Income

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Median Household Income

$84,010
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of $84,010 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $76,148 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $63,996.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of $84,010 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $60,831 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $52,521.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value ($91,905), Sacramento has a value of $84,010 which is lower and worse.
CA Value
($91,905)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value ($75,149), Sacramento has a value of $84,010 which is higher and better.
US Value
($75,149)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Per Capita Income

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Per Capita Income

$39,763
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of $39,763 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $37,717 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $32,012.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of $39,763 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $32,340 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $28,112.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value ($45,591), Sacramento has a value of $39,763 which is lower and worse.
CA Value
($45,591)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value ($41,261), Sacramento has a value of $39,763 which is lower and worse.
US Value
($41,261)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Poverty

Economy / Poverty

Economy / Poverty

County: Sacramento

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Poverty

County: Sacramento

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento Children Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
17.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 17.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 17.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (15.6%), Sacramento has a value of 17.3% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(15.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Sacramento has a value of 17.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Families Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
9.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 9.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 9.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,104 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (8.5%), Sacramento has a value of 9.3% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Sacramento has a value of 9.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Households Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
12.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 12.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (12.0%), Sacramento has a value of 12.7% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (12.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.7%).
Prior Value
(12.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Sacramento People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
10.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 10.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 10.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Sacramento has a value of 10.3% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Sacramento has a value of 10.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count)

Current Value:
23,275
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento People Living 200% Above Poverty Level

Current Value:
70.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 70.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 63.7%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 70.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (72.0%), Sacramento has a value of 70.9% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(72.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (71.2%), Sacramento has a value of 70.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(71.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento People Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
13.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 13.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.2%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 13.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (12.1%), Sacramento has a value of 13.1% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(12.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Sacramento has a value of 13.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

Education / Educational Attainment

Education / Educational Attainment

Education / Educational Attainment

County: Sacramento

Value
Compared to:

Education / Educational Attainment

County: Sacramento

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher

Current Value:
32.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 32.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 24.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 19.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 32.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 20.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (35.9%), Sacramento has a value of 32.6% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(35.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (34.3%), Sacramento has a value of 32.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.