Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

Adolescent Health 2

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Family Planning

Health / Family Planning

Health / Family Planning

County: Sacramento

Value
Compared to:

Health / Family Planning

County: Sacramento

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento Teen Birth Rate: 15-19

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Teen Birth Rate: 15-19

9.7
Live births per 1,000 females aged 15-19
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 9.7 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.6.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 55 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (10.3), Sacramento has a value of 9.7 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(10.3)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (13.9), Sacramento has a value of 9.7 which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.9 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (9.7) is less and better than the previously measured value (10.9).
Prior Value
(10.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Physical Activity

Health / Physical Activity

Health / Physical Activity

County: Sacramento

Value
Compared to:

Health / Physical Activity

County: Sacramento

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento 7th Grade Students who are Physically Fit

Current Value:
65.4%
(2018-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 65.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 56.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (61.0%), Sacramento has a value of 65.4% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (65.4%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (64.4%).
Prior Value
(64.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Teens who Engage in Regular Physical Activity

Current Value:
65.5%
(2011-2012)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 65.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 70.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 44 California counties and county groups.
Compared to the CA Value (68.5%), Sacramento has a value of 65.5% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(68.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (65.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (71.7%).
Prior Value
(71.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Health / Respiratory Diseases

County: Sacramento

Value
Compared to:

Health / Respiratory Diseases

County: Sacramento

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento Children and Teens with Asthma

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Children and Teens with Asthma

11.1%
(2015-2016)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 11.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 43 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (14.6%), Sacramento has a value of 11.1% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(14.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (11.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.7%).
Prior Value
(12.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Weight Status

Health / Weight Status

Health / Weight Status

County: Sacramento

Value
Compared to:

Health / Weight Status

County: Sacramento

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento 9th Grade Students who are at a Healthy Weight or Underweight

63.3%
(2018-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 63.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 62.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 57.6%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (62.2%), Sacramento has a value of 63.3% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(62.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (63.3%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (62.8%).
Prior Value
(62.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Teens who are Overweight or Obese

Current Value:
43.3%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (31.2%), Sacramento has a value of 43.3% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(31.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (43.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (41.2%).
Prior Value
(41.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.